Submitted by izumi3682 t3_xxelcu in Futurology
permaunbanned123 t1_irbwd1v wrote
No, absolutely not. Not under any circumstances.
If AI has human rights that is the end of democracy, the next step is voting rights and then elections will be decided based on who can mass produce the most "voters" with just barely enough computational power to qualify for it.
caustic_kiwi t1_irc6ixx wrote
So not only do you clearly have no idea what modern day AI looks like, but you also clearly did not even GLANCE at the bill in question.
A. General intelligence does not exist. It will not exist in the near or foreseeable future. Modern AI is complicated algorithms trained to perform specific tasks. Nobody is making artificial people. We have nothing even close to that level of technology.
B. The article in question is not about the rights of robots. It's about securing human rights in a world increasingly run by robots. The title is purposefully misleading because OP knows that you aren't going to taken even a quick glance at the content before writing your reactionary comment.
[deleted] t1_irc8iex wrote
[removed]
caustic_kiwi t1_irdlfj8 wrote
Sure, I can also agree that resurrecting Hitler would be a bad idea, but that's not the topic of discussion.
[deleted] t1_irdlnw3 wrote
[removed]
izumi3682 OP t1_ircibhg wrote
>The title is purposefully misleading...
No the title is not misleading at all. That is the official White House name of the set of protections. I thought it was to protect the AI too--until I read the article. I was a kinda disappointed actually, but I figured, well that's interesting a little for society's benefit I suppose. So I decided to post it anyways. See my submission statement. (Not the stickied one, use the link at the bottom of the stickied one.)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments