Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Testdepth634 t1_ispu7bz wrote

Respectfully, No. it’s matching supply and demand for greener H2. Thanks to steam methane reformation, H2 can be easily produced and packed into ammonia via the Haber-Bosch process for easy transportation. However this process uses methane as the feed stock and therefor a big carbon footprint. Using a strip of nuc power and electrolysis facilitates the same thing with almost no carbon footprint. Furthermore the waste hear from the reactor can improve the efficiency of the conversation.

12

sarrcom t1_isrijzr wrote

I did not understand the last sentence. Can you elaborate, please?

4

Testdepth634 t1_isy0pi7 wrote

Some forms of electrolysis (especially solid oxide) require heat that they can make themselves - but at the cost of reduced efficiency. If they can get the heat “free” somewhere else - such as near an industrial process or generator that gives off heat, the efficiency of the entire process can approach 100% - hence why they proposing collocating nuclear and electrolysis .

1