Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Niresque t1_it7q44j wrote

Reply to comment by IM_INSIDE_YOUR_HOUSE in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305

Disclaimer, I disliked AI-art in general.

The original artist would still be used to further evolve the AI, continuous training with more of the artists original works would be the only way the AI could "evolve" otherwise you only get a snapshot of their talent.

−6

CrazyC787 t1_it7qur4 wrote

Yall are giving way too much credit to the future of a fucking denoising algorithm lmfao

−4

[deleted] t1_it8rgzb wrote

[deleted]

2

CrazyC787 t1_it9obtl wrote

Pretty outraged.... 150 years from now, lol. Nice sci-fi cope

1

[deleted] t1_itb3nhu wrote

[deleted]

1

CrazyC787 t1_itgsepm wrote

And yet the rate of innovation has been slowing down the past decade. Moore's law is dead in the water, and the slow down is incredibly obvious if you compare the change in technology from 2000-2012 compared to 2012-2022. AI and a very small handful of other technologies are the only ones actually innovating at a rate consistent with how it was before.

1

Orc_ t1_iths09n wrote

> 150 years from now, lol. Nice sci-fi cope

I think it's somebody else who is trying to cope with a world moving too fast...

1

CrazyC787 t1_itjxb0v wrote

Okay you're right, it'll probably be more like 40-60 years from now lol.

1