towngrizzlytown t1_ithzzus wrote
Reply to comment by Kraeftluder in The cutting-edge cellular therapies aiming to ease America's organ shortage. Major transplantation surgeries could one day become outpatient procedures. by Sariel007
It's also interesting to me how diverse universal healthcare systems can be. For example, the UK approach has government-operated healthcare providers, while the Netherlands has universal coverage through private health insurance.
Anyone interested in reading about different country profiles can do so here: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries
YaAbsolyutnoNikto t1_itk1h4m wrote
Yes, every country does it a slightly different way. Which is great because, winning systems (be them political systems, economic systems, etc.) tend to converge over time to the most successful one.
So, in a few decades, we might know if the German system (health insurance) is superior to the French one (government services), or vice versa.
Kraeftluder t1_itkdlwt wrote
I'm going to say something which is very much not controversial in the UK but relatively controversial in NL and the US: Systems that are closer to the NHS work better than systems like the Dutch one which is closer to the US system. So the French system is better by design than the German one. The German one resembles the former Dutch system if I'm not mistaken.
There is absolutely no need pumping around billions of public money in private companies' administrative systems and compete over a few tens of thousands of clients they can't refuse to insure anyway.
YaAbsolyutnoNikto t1_itke5va wrote
I agree. My country (Portugal) also uses a system like the one on the UK or France.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments