Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TwistDirect t1_itoufel wrote

Reply to comment by fungussa in New Technique For Decoding People's Thoughts Can Now Be Done From a Distance by fungussa

Today we invented a working air-gapped thought Scanner. Dark timeline we’re accelerating towards.

p.s. Dreamt my penis tore longitudinally from too much sex and then on my birthday only hours before a two day and two hour census lockdown I went to work the day after my birthday and every female co-worker chastely kissed me on the lips once. Meanwhile the badly torn outer fleshy outer part had ripped off entirely during birthday oral sex from a dear pneumatic friend and inside was another penis with a restored foreskin that looked like a freshly pupating moth larvae. While my family enjoyed films and water park entertainments, I went looking for my friends and found an entirely different set of friends having summer drinks at lawn tables outside in the heat of a sun-drenched square. We talked about work. I could not concentrate on the conversation because of my freshly molted penis. The fatty ecdysis responsible for most of its former girth I threw away. When I found my birthday party again, the guests were making memories of our time together in the form of photo collage and mix tape song playlists on their tablets. I woke up as I tried to return to my third floor walk up apartment in a wooden hotel with Amsterdam-narrow steep stairs but before I did, my penis had grown back to its usual size but now sported a fresh fleshy foreskin.

There. Let’s see their machine read that.

66

chaogomu t1_itow95n wrote

I mean, right now the machine can tell if you're paying attention to a pre-selected, silent film by watching the visual cortex.

We're still a long way from reading any coherent thought.

35

TwistDirect t1_itox9zt wrote

Not too far.

> The algorithm could then take an fMRI recording and generate a story based on its content, and that story would match the original plot of the podcast or radio show "pretty well," Huth told The Scientist.

> In other words, the decoder could infer what story each participant had heard based on their brain activity.

3

GM8 t1_itpfigo wrote

Pretty well can mean just identifying vague topic, like love, nature, fear or mean a 1000 page detailed description.

Pretty well it means nothing

9

TwistDirect t1_itpmzpx wrote

Yeah, you’re right, it’s a preprint so waiting for the peer-review.

2

GM8 t1_itpwpt1 wrote

That's not what I've said, but thanks for assuming I'm a careful person rather than just argumentative.

3

TwistDirect t1_itpx2qq wrote

You’re welcome! It’s selfish altruism though. You may have been just argumentative yet I benefit on average more from my assumption than its alternatives.

3

UponMidnightDreary t1_its4iyt wrote

Selfish altruism is just something that works for everyone. If you’re trying to do something good, how wonderful for it to feel good for you as well. I’ve stopped seeing “no true altruism” as a depressing thing that means we are all selfish, but instead as just a really cool extra gift.

2

MozerfuckerJones t1_itp111z wrote

Remember, that dumbass from Google thought AI was here.

3

TwistDirect t1_itp1dhi wrote

I do and I’m skeptical of these results also (see my comment above). The claims and reported results are significant because their non-invasive nature and accuracy will catch the interest of industry quickly and where capital flows, innovation sometimes follows. Marketers using this to fine tune advertising targeting is just one concerning application.

1

joey0314 t1_itpk69h wrote

Eventually they will be able to interact with every single neuron in your brain

1

chaogomu t1_itqfytf wrote

Yeah, no.

Not with this technique.

To get every neuron you'd need a very invasive implant.

Hell, this technique can be ruined by just moving your head.

It also needs hours of training data, pre-selected training data. So while this is kind of cool, it's not mind reading, and it's not coherent thoughts.

3

joey0314 t1_itsyuln wrote

You dont need an implant just very sophisticated software your brain is one big wireless reciever you need extremely sophisticated software and a modern high quality broad spectrum microwave radio transciever

2

joey0314 t1_itsyxeg wrote

The barrier is the software not necessarily the hardware

2

joey0314 t1_itsz44h wrote

Also they are working on AI which trains itself automatically

2

Able-Emotion4416 t1_itray2l wrote

By reading the article, I got the feeling that they could re-create the stories they heard. Not the exact wordings, but they still get the story right.

Have I misunderstood something? Isn't that huge?

1

chaogomu t1_itrucew wrote

From my understanding, they could only track the story as the people were in the MRI listening to it. And it took hours of training data before they could do that.

1

[deleted] t1_itptre6 wrote

How are people downplaying this like technology never advances?! Oh, the machine is only reading about a movie someone watched’ Like, what?! This is both amazing and absolutely terrifying.

17