Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

imafraidofmuricans t1_ivu9kqj wrote

It was (is) a big enough issue that the practice of putting antibiotics in livestock feed was outlawed in Sweden in the 80s.

Your anecdote is noted.

Let's put it this way: what is more likely?

Nobody is putting antibiotics on feed and it was outlawed just because, and all these scientists studying the spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria from livestock to humans are just doing it for absolutely no reason (again, see the links above, that's what they are about).

Or

Your family's farm is not typical.

9

CalvinSays t1_ivuaq09 wrote

The objection was not that antibiotics are used in animal agriculture (to treat infections). The objection was that we supposedly give it to animals every day.

Animals deserve medical care too. Doctors over prescribed antibiotics which is a huge issue for antibiotic resistance but agriculturalists are always the scapegoat.

−1

DebrecenMolnar t1_ivufneb wrote

Nobody here is arguing against the use of antibiotics for illness.

What are you failing to understand is that the argument is about the fact that livestock typically are given antibiotics for the sole fact that it will make them grow faster.

It has nothing to do with disease-related administration of antibiotics.

If you’re hung up on the “every day” part just forget about that. It was not accurate. But it would be accurate to say that many livestock are given antibiotics for growth rather than for illness, which is a huge problem.

Congrats on not doing that on your farm. Take your “farm animals deserve healthcare too” shit elsewhere; nobody here is suggesting otherwise. In fact, quite the opposite.

8

mr_bedbugs t1_ivuwrur wrote

>farm animals deserve healthcare too

We don't even have healthcare for our own citizens.

2

YaAbsolyutnoNikto t1_iw172ci wrote

Speak for yourself. I do in my country. I'm also currently living in a developing country in Asia and I still have it.

1