Submitted by filosoful t3_yxm3fo in Futurology
RSomnambulist t1_iwpw3vu wrote
Reply to comment by OptimalConcept143 in Overhyping hydrogen as a fuel risks endangering net-zero goals by filosoful
This also isn't taking into account battery advances like solid state. Amptricity is preselling home batteries now.
OptimalConcept143 t1_iwpxljn wrote
Batteries can't chemically be as energy dense as hydrogen or fossil fuels. They will improve, but not significantly.
jeffreynya t1_iwpxo6h wrote
the cost!! holy Crap!
RSomnambulist t1_iwpy3do wrote
Yeah. They look to be about 2x-3x as expensive as just an LI battery, but there are insurance savings to take into account and the fact that they are significantly safer and more efficient and should last about 10-20y longer. I think the cost is worth it, but they're also the first people on the scene. I expect competition to make them close to LI cost.
sawlaw t1_iwq54tt wrote
I try not to get too hyped for things just because there are a few pre sales. Once production begins in Ernest and there are a few thousand happy customers I think I'd be ready to make the move, until then it's something for people with money to burn and gamble.
RSomnambulist t1_iwq6lcf wrote
I'm not spending my money on it, but I'd say that based on preproduction and existing samples and manufacturing that is online already--solid state is further along than HCV mainly because there is so few HCV infrastructure.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments