Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

james_wheeler OP t1_j0yf144 wrote

Vet and test. Still saves money on the executive end. R&D + IS and let the board of investors vote on it. Maybe ? Not sure 100% but, if we don't automate them, they will automate the workforce. Just thinking we could put some heads together and find a fault or solution. Scientific Method

0

soulwind42 t1_j0ylgze wrote

Why wouldn't the executive AI automate the workforce? Most companies spend a lot more on labor than on executives.

Also, there isn't much to automate at that level, it's all abstract analysis and decision making.

2

Littleman88 t1_j0z6z19 wrote

They're already using AI in some fields like rental pricing to squeeze as much from renters as they can and undoubtedly is already in use for gas pricing, if their advancements in the art fields isn't enough of an indication of their abstract analysis capabilities. No reason to believe that can't extend to the sales of tools, food, and other goods. Going to be wild if people are trying to calculate which hour of the day is the best time to go buy milk.

Mostly, if the job comes down to ensuring the bottom line only ever grows, expect a sophisticated automatic calculator to at least look like a very enticing option over a person the board has to pay 7+ figure bonuses to.

1