Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Surur t1_j1tupdi wrote

Reply to comment by StreetBookRandoNumbr in Is there any real upper limit of technology? by basafish

If you keep on saying that, there will soon be very little left that defines humans.

According to you its not our ability to calculate, and not our ability to recognize patterns, and not our ability to be creative.

What is left?

1

StreetBookRandoNumbr t1_j1tv1ur wrote

Not according to me. Do not put words in my mouth (text)

Ai does not mean being able to match human capabilities. Machine learning does exceed that. It means being able to make decisions and learn on its own. Currently, machine learning learns by us telling it what to learn, so not AI

1

Surur t1_j1tvdkz wrote

> It means being able to make decisions and learn on its own

That is a pretty low hurdle to cross. I think you need to set the bar a bit higher.

1

StreetBookRandoNumbr t1_j1tvx1l wrote

No I don’t. It’s called the Turing Test.

https://bigthink.com/the-future/turing-test-imitation-game/

1

Surur t1_j1twub4 wrote

Most people think the Turning test is not a good enough test these days, as it's too easy for computers to pass just by faking it.

What differentially AI from humans at this point is that, while AI may be good at individual elements of intelligence, humans are the only ones where these are all integrated - the difference between narrow and general intelligence.

Humans are the only GI at the minute, and the goal of some AI research is Artificial General Intelligence. Some people think we are less than 10 years from that.

1