Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] OP t1_j1rhpw5 wrote

Reply to comment by GlitteringBroccoli12 in Entropic Watermark by [deleted]

I believe you are mistaken, the experiment simply produced more power than the laser initiating the fusion. The measure was against the laser beam itself, not the apparatus powering the laser. They are still a long way away from making it sustain the fusion, and powering itself in the process.

1

GlitteringBroccoli12 t1_j1vg3bz wrote

Lame.

I don't think we're far though. Looking at a.i. and realizing that googles quantum computer calculates at a rate supposedly 10,000 human years per 3 hours... While presumably the current maximum rate of simulation, even having a non opinionated a.i. think at a fraction of that speed while giving it the data we gathered from this experiment along with the exploding speed of a.i. which is multiplicative vs additive in annual development its a matter of years. This is before considering the possibilities that after Elons science slaves put neurolink (allowing for competitive markets refining the tech similar to phones yet faster) is in play. That will be entering human trials early next year.

1