Submitted by Falzon03 t3_103yc6u in Futurology
tugnasty t1_j3235ju wrote
So it's just a big 3D tv that doesn't require glasses. And they think we need to see somebody's whole body while video chatting at work, while they stand in some weird frame?
Apart from this not being a hologram, I don't understand the actual use of this as they are presenting it.
Why would anyone want to go stand in a frame in front of a camera while someone else does the same just so that they can both see each other's pants and shoes?
If can't transfer any information you couldnt send in an email.
"I'm wearing khaki slacks and brown shoes."
Lou-Saydus t1_j33fk0s wrote
This, it’s a 3D tv without the need for glasses. Really cool on its own, but not a hologram
pab_guy t1_j332f6w wrote
I don't know this is just a 3d TV. I don't know what it is at all because the tech is never explained anywhere. For all I know it's a 2d transparent screen in the middle of a white box.
Pretentious-Jackal t1_j3djlwa wrote
buT wHat aBoUT BOdY LaNguage!!! /s
Falzon03 OP t1_j323xh0 wrote
Yes I agree, the presented it horribly for real world use. They are tugging at heart strings to get hype and get people to talk about it. Practical uses would be University biolabs with a touch overlay, executive conference rooms, manufacturing facilities for this gs like visualizing a product before preproduction ect.
It would require special cameras on the far end so would never be used for personal video calls.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments