I think you’re driving at current lawsuits that could possibly be used as precedent in other future lawsuits. As far as I know, there is no serious conversion of “banning” any generative AI technology at the local, state, or federal level.

Current lawsuits brought by Getty, etc could possibly set copyright limitations and determine how profitable it would be to implement such tech in outputting media properties.

If corporations cannot completely own the AI generated output, what would be the point of investing millions (billions?) into this? It’s not like the majority of creatives are given the biggest piece of the pie.