Artist here, making music, some writing and animation, etc. I have plenty of experience, and firmly disagree with everything you said. Art is a truly statistically and AI-solvable thing. Cause it's only limited to expression of the human mind and the end listener/reader/etc receiving the expression. Given that it's limited to the human mind, it's exceptionally solvable. Humans aren't that unpredictable.

I keep hearing people say that AI doesn't 'have a message' with art, but that really doesn't... mean anything. Like, at all. It's just saying 'art I like is more real than that other art', which is a constant in the art world of discrediting and rejecting whatever the new thing is. If the message is emotional or directed or something like that, yeah, AI can do that.

And by my own viewing, I've already seen tons of AI art that's better than the output of a lot of human artists I know. AI models are good with visual images and writing and are very quickly improving. Whether or not it 'touches the human heart' is totally and completely up to the end user. I've certainly seen excellent AI art and have had touching interactions with chatbots, so that's already the case.