Submitted by AdGroundbreaking1870 t3_10pnihh in Futurology
Comments
ToothlessGrandma t1_j6loyrz wrote
Unfortunately that's never going to happen. AI and Chat GPT are the biggest things changing society now, so that means by default it's going to be a major topic for years.
[deleted] t1_j6nolyg wrote
[deleted]
FeatheryBallOfFluff t1_j6o8bws wrote
This sub has quality assurance? Half the websites posted here are hardly reputable.
baumpop t1_j6o0nyf wrote
Dont worry well be seeing plenty of articles pulling water out of the air too.
FalseTebibyte t1_j6mchdm wrote
Kind of like they're going all Monsters Inc and Terror-forming us all. Seems the plot where Shep merged with the Reapers is indeed Borg-like in similarity.
Kayakerguide t1_j6lrq5q wrote
That would be like having a sub about food that can't talk about meat, would be a totally different experience
BenZed t1_j6mnq1l wrote
I’m sure there are vegan food subs.
equalopurtunityotter t1_j6m86cv wrote
You sound like someone from the early 90's complaining about everyone talking about the internet lol AI is going to change every aspect of our live in the next 15 years so of course futurology is gonna have lots of posts about all its progress and accomplishments
Howard_Cosine t1_j6pk0au wrote
You sound like someone from right now who can’t manage to speak in complete and separate sentences.
LurkingLarry43 t1_j6lt66e wrote
I’m actually okay with it 🤷♂️
SuckmyBlunt545 t1_j6lqhcl wrote
It ain’t talking about chat gpt directly tho so this one’s fine imo
Fexxvi t1_j6ngl5q wrote
AI's are arguably the biggest technological advance right now. If they can't be discussed in a sub dedicated to technological advances then that sub is pointless.
BackyardAnarchist t1_j6lsg09 wrote
There are already multiple.
Nightshade_Ranch t1_j6oizqw wrote
It's the future, yo.
hydraofwar t1_j6n7dgb wrote
I love AI, but i agree, this is for general futurology
LizardWizard444 t1_j6lxkos wrote
....this isn't that impressive. Evolution is a blindly shambling optimizer that will leap and bound forward on shear luck. There are problem that Evolution would take longer than the atoms of the universe has to exist that a grad student in comp-sci will solve in an afternoon (the enigma machine for example).
Human evolution is largely divorced from standard evolution because of our tool use. Theoretical there are changes getting made constantly just to keep up with disease but even the imunocompromised can live well past what genes and nature would say on the matter.
grumpyfrench t1_j6mrlfu wrote
how if we did avoid local minimum crab form
Narrow_Exam_6555 t1_j6o9pg1 wrote
I chuckled at this CS and biology joke, ty for providing me with a small amount of entertainment.
Narrow_Exam_6555 t1_j6o84cu wrote
If I have learned anything during my CS degree it's that random bullshit can produce desired outcomes, if you are astronomically lucky (see start of life on Earth). However, in some situations making intelligent and careful use of random decisions can help guide our search processes to find solutions to difficult and complex problems in a way that is provably, mathematically efficient.
LizardWizard444 t1_j6obgy6 wrote
I can't argue with that but still people who touted evolutioni's genius also fail to understand it's blindness and idiocy.
Narrow_Exam_6555 t1_j6oczps wrote
It's like a blind man in an old timey cartoon. Comically wandering obliviously through his environment, evading dangers everywhere he goes in close call after close call. By sheer luck he accidentally fumbles about and saves a baby and puts a gang of criminals in jail.
The whole city cheers for him and gives him all kinds of awards and he's just like:
"Eh-excuse me good sir, I am looking for Johnson's pharmacy, on the corner of 9th street and 6th avenue. Could you offer some guidance please?"
LizardWizard444 t1_j6oh4o2 wrote
Yeah, ultimately evolution's true achievement is the fact it managed to optimize in the first place. The fact that random chunk of chemicals got together and make more of itself and then make more of other stuff and so on and so forth till the world got covered in thos carbon nanostructreal iterative mesh making directed optimized processes is the cool part. All taking advantage of the fact if there's more of something that can make itself than that something will increase in number.
Narrow_Exam_6555 t1_j6oink1 wrote
The probability of life emerging in the universe is quite low, but it's definitely higher than 0.
LizardWizard444 t1_j6ole3w wrote
I know that, rudementry life is largely just a matter of getting the right chemicals in place. But the truely interesting part is that it continues and iterates. Statistical laws and higher mathmatical patterns pushing innert chemicals into rudimentary life is amazing, the complexity that emerged is so incredibly fascinating and the fact an animal born of this motion with a sophisticated enough mind to refine the underlying math purely and susinctly is miraculous.
The real crazy stuff is all around is happening even as i type this and most people go they're whole lives never really thinking about even three fourths the phenomenon they encounter on a daily basis. The true marvel of AI is that it must calculate from the simplest math into the more complicated. A human brain may be good enough to identify "tiger" and "danger" afew precious seconds to keep us alive but a machine has ti run the tiger through math and comes to a more complete picture in milliseconds w4the processing we pack nowadays.
Franksenbeanz t1_j6p9cne wrote
I'm unconvinced that either of you are human.
khamelean t1_j6lup4s wrote
Simulating evolution has been one of the most basic algorithms in computer programming since the 1960s.
arth4 t1_j6n14bu wrote
From the article it's not simulating evolution at all. They trained it on lots of example protein sequences, and it produced a few new good ones. No EA/GP as far as I can see
AdGroundbreaking1870 OP t1_j6lgpnx wrote
Researchers developed an AI capable of copying evolution itself. This doesn’t mean the AI created some sort of evolutionary superior superhuman (yet), but instead, the AI designed sequences of 20 amino acids that make up proteins. When compared to nature’s handiwork, some of the sequences worked just as well as ones generated over millions of years of evolution.
Interestingly, scientists didn’t design an AI from scratch, but rather, repurposed one from an unlikely field: a language model. Researchers used natural language-processing abilities and focused on the “sentences” of biological proteins—essentially a language of amino acids.
“In the same way that words are strung together one-by-one to form text sentences, amino acids are strung together one-by-one to make proteins”
Overall, Salesforce estimates that 73 percent of ProGen’s proteins could function, compared to 59% of natural proteins, and found that the AI was also able to detect evolutionary patterns (though it wasn’t specifically designed to)
TLDR: Singularity is just around the corner.
namelttuh t1_j6nwc7a wrote
What does singularity have to do with this?
[deleted] t1_j6lhkkz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6liw4s wrote
[removed]
kubelke t1_j6mckr0 wrote
Isn’t it just compiling information from the internet and serving in a bit more sophisticated way?
If you play a bit with ChatGPT you will notice that it’s a bit generic. Ask for writing a review two different professions. You won’t get very unique results even if you ask for that.
IamChuckleseu t1_j6mfd40 wrote
It is more sophisticated text generator. Nothing else. AI term is misleading that creates unnecessary sensation.
Howard_Cosine t1_j6lgt04 wrote
Can we just make another sub for AI?? AI this and Chat GPT that is 99% of the posts here. Wasn’t there a mod post a few weeks ago pledging to filter out this low effort content??