Submitted by MeronDC t3_115zpvb in Futurology
cmcewen t1_j9dcg74 wrote
Reply to comment by jazzageguy in Which medical specialties are future proof? by MeronDC
If I know one thing it would be to never assume we know what is possible in the future.
But I can safely say that AI and robotics is not anywhere close to autonomous surgery right now. But who knows in 30 years where things will be.
jazzageguy t1_j9dcwog wrote
I hope it's not rude to say this to a surgeon, but in 30 years I very much hope for surgery to be rare, and for most diseases to be prevented and/or treated by genetic manipulation. Future generations will look at surgery as we look at bloodletting.
jazzageguy t1_j9dde7m wrote
By "diseases" I include those of aging, and aging itself. I don't see why cell death should be the norm after we figure out how to keep cells healthy. I think the present human lifespan is a historical accident, limited because in the resource-limited past we had to make room for new generations, and the idea of a finite lifespan has, so to say, outlived its usefulness.
cmcewen t1_j9dft2y wrote
No offense taken. I spend half my day talking people out of surgery
I suspect There will always be surgery. Some problems are simply a mechanical problem that can’t be fixed any other way. How can a hernia be fixed without surgery? It’s a structural issue. How can dead bowel be fixed without removing it?
Surgery will always be a component, but you’re right that it’ll always be changing. And we already do much less surgery on people than we used to and we use minimally invasive techniques.
jazzageguy t1_j9dgina wrote
I didn't say NO surgery. Do we really do less than before? I hadn't known that.
cmcewen t1_j9dgsw1 wrote
I don’t have any stats to back that up.
jazzageguy t1_j9dgxdk wrote
It's ok, I'm happy to stipulate it
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments