Submitted by euronews-english t3_11d8q10 in Futurology
Cindexxx t1_ja9kiiu wrote
Reply to comment by WillBottomForBanana in Robots could do 39% of domestic chores within 10 years, experts say by euronews-english
Nope, some new ones empty themselves. Sure eventually you have to empty the larger container, but as long as they don't get lost they'll return to the charger, empty, and go back out again when needed. Pretty much fully automated.
Appliances aren't robots though. You don't call a regular vacuum a robot because it picks things up for you. You wouldn't call a washing machine a robot either. It's an appliance.
Now if we had a little rolly guy that would collect dishes, wash them (in a dishwasher + spot cleaning "by hand"), and put them away, THAT'S a robot.
Same for clothes. Assuming you have regular places for you clothes it could grab them from the dirty hamper, wash, fold, and put them away.
Honestly we could probably build a robot to do those things already, we have good enough tech. When it's the same items repeatedly rather than new stuff, pattern recognition is pretty great.
WillBottomForBanana t1_ja9lnm1 wrote
>Sure eventually you have to empty the larger container
Your just moving tasks around to pretend that they are accomplished. This is dishonest of you.
Cindexxx t1_jaa80or wrote
But it is noticeably less work. Empty it every single time or empty it every 50 times? It's basically maintenance now. Same for a robot that could do laundry. Eventually you have to refill the soap. You don't have to do it every time though, just like once every 100 or however many loads worth of soap you can add at a time.
Robot doesn't mean it needs to be fully automated.
WillBottomForBanana t1_ja9liek wrote
>You wouldn't call a washing machine a robot either.
I've been calling my washing machines, dishwashers and dryers robots for years.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments