velifer t1_iwqqv30 wrote
Reply to comment by JoshN1986 in Ask research questions in plain language and get answers directly from the full text of research articles by JoshN1986
Since it's an actively harmful app with a core purpose to subvert critical review of scientific papers and only pull decontextualized snippets, the best thing you could do would be take it down.
This is a tool that is designed only to streamline confirmation bias.
JoshN1986 OP t1_iwqreg9 wrote
I disagree with your harsh assessment and really your tone. We show citation context, which makes it easy to see how and why a paper has been cited in the literature, including if it has been supported or contrasted by other studies.
With scite, you can see if a paper has been supported/challenged.
Without scite, you only see a list of citing articles.
How does that streamline confirmation bias?
flowerchild413 t1_iwskxiz wrote
>We show
When did this sub become about self-promotion...?
throw4jklfj t1_iwue4kx wrote
How you gonna disagree with a tone.
velifer t1_iwuqxw9 wrote
>really your tone.
Zero fucks given. The mountain does not care if you believe in it. I don't care if you think I'm an asshole.
Reality doesn't change because you don't like the messenger, douche.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments