Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

race2tb t1_jdeilah wrote

Just like google search every other way we do things is going to change. Why do I need a website if I can just feed model my info have it generate everything when people want my content. Things are going to be completely rethought because of natural language to generative ai. We used to be the ones that had to maintain these things and build the content, now we do not really have to. All we need to do is make sure the AI stays well fed and have the links to any data it has to present which it cannot store.

22

frequenttimetraveler t1_jdekst3 wrote

> Why do I need a website if I can just feed model my info have it generate everything when people want my content.

It will be a big deal if openAI pays for content.

9

currentscurrents t1_jdf547h wrote

I expect it's more likely that people will run their own chatbots with proprietary content. (Even if just built on top of the GPT API)

For example you might have a news chatbot that knows the news and has up-to-date information not available to ChatGPT. And you'd pay a monthly subscription to the news company for it, not to OpenAI.

0

WarmSignificance1 t1_jdeqxg8 wrote

Seems like trying to fit a square peg. Why would you want to do this instead of having a static website?

If we’re talking about dynamic websites that’s a whole different ballgame, and LLMs seem even less appropriate for them.

4

race2tb t1_jdhgx48 wrote

Sites may not even exist. They may become feeds for the AI. The AI will access the schematic metadata info sheet of the service that trains the AI on its functionalities and content. Then the generative AI handles everything based on the user's natural language inputs.

4

WarmSignificance1 t1_jdhi4rj wrote

I get the concept, and I see this working for a small subset of websites. But have you seen an average person interact with a website before? Having a non-deterministic GUI will absolutely kill UX in my opinion. Not to mention that many business want way more control over what they display to users than a LLM will afford.

2

race2tb t1_jdhq01x wrote

Not up to the business, it is up to the user. Would a user rather go to several sites to do different things or go to one site and do everything with natural language as the only requirement to interact with it.

3

WarmSignificance1 t1_jdhrkof wrote

Well now you’re conflating two different things. A unified experience is always good. This is why mobile took over; instead of having to browse to various websites, you just touch your apps that are all next to each other.

Natural language seems highly inefficient for lots of things. I don’t want to type to my bank. I want to open up an app/website and click a button to make a transfer.

3

race2tb t1_jdhtzzm wrote

You can crosstalk information and functionality in the version of the future I am talking about. Moating in different apps is going to seem unappealing. I'd rather have my digital life stuff all in one place and be able to run whatever function I want on it. This can be done with microservices handling that in the background. I can even create a function that doesn't exist in natural language.

There is nothing special about most of these interfaces either and I can just show it a picture of an interface and it will match it. I can draw it on a napkin if I want =).

2

VelvetyPenus t1_jdj51e0 wrote

I'm sorry, but I cannot guess your neighbor's PIN code or provide any assistance with potentially unethical or illegal activities. It is important to respect other people's privacy and avoid engaging in any actions that could cause harm or violate their rights. It is best to focus on positive and lawful ways to interact with your neighbors and build a positive community.

1

yokingato t1_jdgi0la wrote

Can you explain what you mean? I didn't understand, sorry.

2

WarmSignificance1 t1_jdhh6w9 wrote

I just don't see replacing GUIs with LLMs making sense in general.

Do people really want to access their bank via a LLM? I see that being an inferior user experience.

5

yokingato t1_jdig5x0 wrote

Oh. Thanks for explaining. I have no idea tbh. I think most people are lazy and want the easiest option, but that could be wrong.

2