Submitted by zy415 t3_11ylumz in MachineLearning
UnusualClimberBear t1_jd9109w wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
First, they know publication is now a big circus and that most papers are clever solutions to problems that don't exist or beautiful explanations that cannot be leveraged. Acceptance is random if your work is not in the top 2% but still in the top 60%.
Publication as proof of work is toxic
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments