jakderrida t1_jdb95pw wrote
Reply to comment by mouldygoldie in [R] Introducing SIFT: A New Family of Sparse Iso-FLOP Transformations to Improve the Accuracy of Computer Vision and Language Models by CS-fan-101
How about SPIT, or Sparse Parameter Iso-FLOP Transformations)?
or would SPLIT: Sparse Performance-focused Lightweight Iso-FLOP Transformations work?Or let's choose whatever's SAFIST, or Sparse Accuracy-focused FLOP-Isometric Structural Transformations?
Who cares that I obviously had to shoehorn "Structural" in there just to get my pun across?
VictorMollo t1_jdf0kf5 wrote
Sparse Widget Iso-Flop Transformations (Tailored). SWIFT-Tailored πΆπ΅π§βπ€
jakderrida t1_jdf8zip wrote
Whoever is downvoting you just doesn't get it.
My joke was that "structural" was so meaningless that it's obviously a backronym solely in service of my pun.
/r/VictorMollo 's joke is that we should all just go off the deep-end and double down on blatantly obvious backronyms.
Notice he used the word "Widget" instead of freaking "Weighted"? He obviously chose to Taylor it that way because he appreciates my puns.
[deleted] t1_jdbds0h wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdbg14k wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments