Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Unicycldev t1_ir8w2fj wrote

these videos are super trippy. It’s like these algorithms have taken shrooms.

31

master3243 t1_ir95zxe wrote

It reminds me of image generation in the early days (a few years ago lol) when it wasn't yet super realistic.

Although this is faster than I expected it's still obviously not at the level of Imagen with image generation.

26

ThePerson654321 t1_ir98sqw wrote

I find it difficult to believe we will achieve the same video fidelity compared to image generation.

−1

master3243 t1_ir9a5wt wrote

Image generation is by definition an easier task so the two will never catch up.

But do you not think that at some point in the future, video generation in the year 20XX will be better than image generation in 2022?

Even in the year 2050 or 2100?

20

ThePerson654321 t1_ir9adad wrote

Perhaps a few seconds but never a full movie.

−16

master3243 t1_ir9bp3h wrote

What about a coherent 30 second silent clip from a short description that is as difficult to distenguish from real images as current SOTA image generation.

6

cleverestx t1_irbcdi0 wrote

Why not? I admit it IS more challenging, but video is only a series of images...

1

RBUexiste-RBUya t1_ir9npts wrote

Our dreams or nightmares when the humans (and other animals) are asleep, are trippier than that :-D

That's how our brain fights agains itself to discard impossible things, movements, situations, physics, etc. Dreams and trippy minds are the best neuronal thinking (later, is needed a good discard of not wanted results, of course)

Do you remember that old cat-face-recognition that only saw cat faces in supermarket, stores, etc? That was very trippy too (and a little schizophrenic)

1