Submitted by beezlebub33 t3_xxyeun in MachineLearning
MrAcurite t1_irfag9x wrote
Reply to comment by new_name_who_dis_ in [D] Giving Up on Staying Up to Date and Splitting the Field by beezlebub33
"Computer Vision" on its own is already a fucking massive field though, covering generative modeling, scene understanding, edge hardware, and everything in between.
csreid t1_irfzua0 wrote
Generative image models probably need to fork off sometime soon, especially text-guided versions. It's a pet peeve of mine that we're calling it "vision". Vision, at least to me, implies seeing/making sense of what is actually there.
Ulfgardleo t1_irg49u1 wrote
While text-guided image generation is flavour of the month, i don't think that it has broad enough impact to generate a consistent large enough amount of papers to be able to sustain its own conference.
eliminating_coasts t1_iri5g4z wrote
I suspect automated image generation is going to become an industry, if not a separate field of study, within the next three years, so we'll start seeing hybrid programmer/artist conferences springing up, with people leaning more towards demonstrations rather than papers.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments