Submitted by regalalgorithm t3_ym6j8h in MachineLearning
IWantAGrapeInMyMouth t1_iv4z01s wrote
Reply to comment by cyborgsnowflake in [D] Sigmoid Social, an alternative to Twitter by and for the AI Community by regalalgorithm
Mate when your argument relies on comparing oppressed groups in society that are oppressed due to no reason other than something they cannot change to people who openly choose to follow an ideology, the comparison starts to fall apart. You being right wing doesn’t make you oppressed, lol. You can just stop being right wing at any point.
I’m asking for proof that right wingers are suspended at a higher rate for the same actions. You don’t have anything to prove that, so you’re just guessing. Why are you interested in a data based field when you can’t demonstrate correlation that removes confounding variables?
cyborgsnowflake t1_iv7fbit wrote
Mate when your argument relies on comparing oppressed groups in society that are oppressed
Either a correlation matters or it doesn't, how sorry you feel for a group plays no scientific role.
You being right wing doesn’t make you oppressed, lol. You can just stop being right wing at any point.
People can flip their deepseated beliefs like a light switch. Sounds scientific to me!
I’m asking for proof that right wingers are suspended at a higher rate for the same actions. You don’t have anything to prove that, so you’re just guessing.
I gave it to you. Republicans are suspended at a 5x for the same actions of talking on twitter just like Dems do. What confounding variables are you talking about?
IWantAGrapeInMyMouth t1_iv80rbt wrote
you’re not a serious person
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments