Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

uluzg OP t1_ivf8e2k wrote

1

OptimizedGarbage t1_ivfaj2b wrote

They're the same. Calc 3 should be considered as a prerequisite for anything involving neural nets. Trying to understand their behavior without it is like trying to go into physics without learning calc.

2

chcampb t1_ivf9mhv wrote

Could be similar. Multivariable I think is a precursor to vector.

For us, we learned vector calculus as needed, such as in electromagnetics.

Calc 1 was derivatives and integrals and related. Calc 2 was derivatives and integrals of transcendant functions (exponent/log, trig functions etc) and time series. Calc 3 was a little bit of all of those things but in multiple dimensions, so partial derivatives, double integrals, and probably some vector stuff.

What we did for the vector calc part of emag was anything required there, up through some of the easier boundary value problems methods. But calc 3 didn't include like, divergence and curl, surface integrals, greens or stokes theorem, etc, where these are needed for specific emag problems.

1