Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

HateRedditCantQuitit t1_ix4d4sx wrote

You can scale semi-supervised learning much more easily and cheaply and safely than you can scale human-in-the-loop RL. Similar to why we don’t train self driving cars by putting them in the real world and making them learn by RL.

If we could put a language model in a body and let it learn safely through human tutoring in a more time effective and cost effective way, maybe it could be worthwhile. Today, it doesn’t seem to be the time effective or cost effective solution.

And while I’m on my podium, once LMs are in any loop commercially talking to people at scale, I expect this will be a huge topic.

Tangentially, check out this short story/novella that kinda explores the idea from a fictional perspective. It’s incredibly well written and interesting by a favorite author of mine. “The Lifecycle of Software Objects” by Ted Chiang https://web.archive.org/web/20130306030242/http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/fall_2010/fiction_the_lifecycle_of_software_objects_by_ted_chiang

18

blazejd OP t1_ix7iz8w wrote

Indeed the data availability, time and cost effectiveness seem are some sensible reasons I was considering. But we already have chatbots and voice assistants talking to people at scale, don't we?

0