Submitted by hardmaru t3_z36n5j in MachineLearning
sam__izdat t1_ixneldl wrote
Reply to comment by hadaev in [P] Stable Diffusion 2.0 Announcement by hardmaru
> conspiracy about due "legal issues they’re facing"
No, they might be a bunch of mewling toddlers, but that's not a conspiracy theory. There was a lot of corporate and legislative pressure to remove objectionable content, so it appears they mostly removed human anatomy, weapons, certain contemporary artists, celebrity faces, etc. The problem with that, I expect, is that LAION's dataset is already just awful -- and you're cutting into some of the better data you have available.
hadaev t1_ixnh0ro wrote
>so it appears they mostly removed human anatomy, weapons, certain contemporary artists, celebrity faces, etc.
Ah, appears.
How many data samples you tested for this conclusion?
sam__izdat t1_ixnhbrh wrote
I'm just going by what I've seen people try to produce and say, so far. I haven't done any extensive testing, partly because I'm using an ancient Tesla GPU and they broke FP32.
4name25 t1_ixnikga wrote
I run SD with R5 m330 :o
sam__izdat t1_ixnio4j wrote
Solidarity.
hadaev t1_ixnrhn4 wrote
Colab.
But yeah, usually such big models are tested on huge scales.
Some cherry picked comparisons with tens samples shows nothing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments