Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KonArtist01 t1_j1ux9mu wrote

To me the art it is not distinguishable anymore. It passes the Turing test. I think it scares a lot of people, but that‘s the new reality

0

Ulfgardleo t1_j1vd1op wrote

there are definitely signs. paper texture is often wrong. hands are often wrong. With all my guesses of "old master" i was never really sure, but with the AI guesses i often were pretty confident.

3

KonArtist01 t1_j1vsr9l wrote

But it got to the point where there is no sure tell. If you encounter an AI painting in the wild, no one will give you the correct answer. And the important thing is that the signs you mentioned do not take anything away from the beauty that lies within.

3

Ulfgardleo t1_j1w3qhc wrote

I am not sure about you but I can predict a significant amount of ai paintings with high confidence. There are still significant errors in paper/material texture. Like "the model has not understood that canvas threads do not swirl". Or "this Hand looks off" or "this eye looks wrong".

(All three examples visible in the painting test above).

1

FilthyCommieAccount t1_j1vmmm8 wrote

Nah i got 9/11 for art. It passes the at a glance test though and I was never really sure. How I did it is there's a distinct way we pose people in modern paintings that looks different than classical poses. Also in some AI paintings the faces looked too detailed and also modern. The other thing that gives it away are hands and eyes. Give it a few years though and I'm confident that even under inspection only pros will be able to tell.

1

KonArtist01 t1_j1vtm3e wrote

Yes, I expect it to become even better. Even now, just imagine the possibilities, it's like having a private painter at your fingertips.

2

FilthyCommieAccount t1_j1vxrwy wrote

Yeah it's fascinating. I redid it and went to a hundred and got 71/100 so it's more difficult than my short test indicated. I'm sure if I hadn't been following AI art like I have the past year I would have done much worse.

3