Submitted by groman434 t3_103694n in MachineLearning
clavalle t1_j35eqzp wrote
Reply to comment by CrypticSplicer in [Discussion] If ML is based on data generated by humans, can it truly outperform humans? by groman434
Makes sense.
An interesting question related to OPs: could there be a ML solution that humans /can't/ understand?
Not /don't/ understand...but I mean given enough time and study a given solution both outperforms humans and is relatively easy to verify but we cannot understand the underlying model at all.
My current belief is that no model is truly beyond human reasoning. But I've seen some results that make me wonder.
BurgooButthead t1_j3augjm wrote
I wonder this about too. Like if there was some alien technology that we cant understand even if we were taught.
clavalle t1_j3cniyn wrote
Doesn't even have to be alien. Just the familiar seen from a wholly different perspective.
Like whatever these models are doing here: https://scitechdaily.com/artificial-intelligence-discovers-alternative-physics/
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments