demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/timbrooks/instruct-pix2pix

github: https://github.com/timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix

project page: https://www.timothybrooks.com/instruct-pix2pix/

[removed]

Check my post history for some ways I’m using it.

In case someone is interested, I implemented this in my Stable Diffusion Windows GUI:

https://nmkd.itch.io/t2i-gui

(Source Code: https://github.com/n00mkrad/text2image-gui/)

Nice interface

Fantastic! All your AI GUIs are great stuff.

Would love to see a GUI for Whisper sooner or later, not really a good, all-in-one install for it out there AFAIK.

There’s Buzz.

[removed]

All AI art is gross and you can't convince me otherwise.

https://imgflip.com/i/796v75

[removed]

Now art will be more concept than skill based. That means a lot more people having the chance to expand their creativity. Yes, such an horrible thing. /s

Can someone explain how this differs from the Prompt-2-Prompt system that was used to generate the training data for this model?

I mean then you find AI gross generally… and thus, why are you here?

Oh no, those artists will lose their jobs instead of using AI as a tool to improve their work!!! Just like when Photoshop came out!!! /s

Because...?

"Give Woody drugs."

Put this in a $1 app asap...

People have been losing their jobs to automation for centuries. Artists complaining about AI annoy me because they act all high and mighty like they’re somehow above every other job that’s been replaced in the past 200 years.

You’re not above a factory worker who loses his or her job to a robot, but I doubt you ever thought for more than a second about those workers. It’s part and parcel of technological advances and if you want to stay relevant you have to move to higher levels of abstraction. Learn to work with the AI and let it enhance your work.

Cursed woody

Definitely don't blame the capitalists going with the cheaper option at the expense of quality for sure

second your Whisper request.

It's already in a free app, Draw Things

Note: not mine, just like it a lot

The balance between image and text cgf is awkward. Doesn't give consistent results. Creates totally different images but with given prompt. Hope they find something to fix it.

It looks disgusting. Look at the hands on the cake. Look ar woodie's brow. It makes me feel queasy.

I don't. It's a useful tool. Im interested in learning how it works so i can understand what I'm being presented with - specifically when it comes to segmentation and feature identification in images.

I just feel physically repulsed by the output from the Art.

The textures, the colours, the composites between different images to produce the final result. They make me really uncomfortable. It's a physical sensation.

[removed]

You realize that's a dude, right?

[deleted]

[removed]

Thanks for the suggestion, just tried it out however and there seems to be a bug or two, one of which is where it loops the same subtitle over and over.

amazing

>InstructPix2Pix

Can this run on CPU?

I think so, haven't tried though

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

This model asks you to put instructions instead of two prompts describing the input and output images.

[removed]

Ah thanks. That's a really clever trick for making training data.

Sounds like an issue you should talk to your psychologist about. I certainly feel no physical sensation when looking at AI art (or any art) beyond "oh this looks good" or "this looks ugly" (if those even count as physical sensations).

It's very weird to have such a visceral feeling of disgust just based on looking at art.

> the composites between different images to produce the final result

Lol, that's not how AI art works. Are you sure you're in the right place? See that's the problem being in a space like this - you are very likely talking to someone who actually knows how things work.

AI art works by denoising, it isn't a "composite". It isn't "mixing images". It doesn't have images to mix.

Stable Diffusion for example, was trained on 240 terabytes of data - 2.3 billion 512x512 images, and the models are between 2 to 8 gigabytes of data. That means equivalent to about 1-4 bytes of data per image (with a 512x512 image being a bit bigger than 250 kilobytes in total size).

Suffice to say, you cannot compress 250,000 bytes of data into 1-4 bytes of data (mathematically, it is impossible). If that level of compression was possible, that would be the bigger story compared to AI art, because data transmission just got a wholllllllllleeeeeee lot faster, by orders of magnitude.

So yeah, get out of here with that "composite" nonsense. There's no composite. It's literally mathematically impossible for there to be a composite.