Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BeardedBaxterholic t1_iqm6j6c wrote

They would be exponentially better if the soles actually had legitimate grip. Their soles are garbage when it really matters.

196

RatherNerdy t1_iqng50a wrote

But they aren't meant for snow, etc. They were originally meant to be "silent" when walking through the forest and waterproof. They deliver on both fronts.

21

IamSauerKraut t1_iqmi7y3 wrote

The very reason I've never had a pair. Do have other types of boots I've bought from Bean, tho.

19

BeardedBaxterholic t1_iqmjfla wrote

Same here. Imagine if they combined the Classic Bean boot with a vibram sole. They would sell even better. I've never understood why they don't increase the grip factor.

37

usual_nerd t1_iqn71p7 wrote

I have exactly these boots from Bean. I bought them 20 years ago. They have thick felt liners for warmth and a vibram lug sole. They are very heavy but are amazing when dealing with the worst of winter. I do have a more recent pair of regular Bean boots, which I avoided for years because of the sole but bought for fall/spring. Actually found them great for walking in winter, just not when it’s super icy or deep snow. Grip is better than I anticipated.

10

mcCola5 t1_iqo2ctf wrote

Damn... I got some boots from bean. I've never had nice boots before. They were from the outlet. I think I paid 120... they were originally 249.

They are super warm and def going to keep out the wet, but the grip doesn't make sense to me. I was thinking maybe there is just some science I didnt understand.

Ah well... guess I'll get some other boots.

Recommendations welcome.

5

cmonman- t1_iqov8j9 wrote

The boots are made for hunting. The soles were designed for hunters to be able to keep their eyes in the woods and be able to really feel the forest floor despite wearing boots that would protect their feet.

Personally, I love them. I also have a pair of boots from Ugg that I like even better, though, they are called the Adirondack. They're waterproof & true snow boots. Very expensive, very worth it IMO.

7

BowZAHBaron t1_iqo443q wrote

I think the point is that Bean boots are meant to be versatile working around the house in any weather or condition vibe and they sell the other books with more grip so you gotta buy two and then use the more grippy ones for actual hiking / trekking

4

BeardedBaxterholic t1_iqo9jnc wrote

I've made it a personal rule to not wear footwear in any season that doesn't have a vibram sole. It's grippy in all conditions and provides great confidence. My suggestion would be to try out the vibram rubber. It's magic.

2

freeportme t1_iqo7i5q wrote

Bear Claw is what they called them best boot ever and I hate LL Bean!

1

brdwatchr t1_iqn0dby wrote

Perhaps they are made in China, where they skimp on what really matters for the sake of profits.

−22

KookeyMoose t1_iqnvky2 wrote

Never had a pair, although you agree they are garbage? Wtf?

5

BeardedBaxterholic t1_iqo9ngf wrote

I've never owned a pair. Wore them? Yes. But it was borrowing them. Should have clarified.

1

IamSauerKraut t1_iqo9znz wrote

I've picked up more than a few folks who landed on their backsides while wearing them. Tried on a few pairs, brought in a few pairs for repair, even touched them. Just not up to my standards.

0

Left_Dish6793 t1_iqo8vh8 wrote

It’s because bean boots are marketed for the woodsman in wooded Wet conditions. Not for walking around concrete lmao do your research dum dum

5

BeardedBaxterholic t1_iqo99pw wrote

Ever worn a pair of classic bean boots in the woods? Stepped on damp roots? Slick lichen? Wet leaves? It's a poor, outdated design flaw. Hence why sole technology & design has been updated across the entire industry.

XOXO,

A Dum Dum

8

damariscove t1_iqp7yb4 wrote

Agreed, but for the money they are warm and perfectly fine in powder. They definitely require cramp-ons with ice.

1