Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

tzedek OP t1_izy4iie wrote

A scam is a fraudulent scheme or deception designed to cheat individuals or organizations out of money or other assets. Scammers typically use a variety of tactics to deceive their victims, such as creating fake websites, impersonating legitimate businesses, or using phishing emails to obtain sensitive information.

Scams can take many forms, including pyramid schemes, Ponzi schemes, fake investment opportunities, lottery scams, and romance scams. These schemes are often designed to appear legitimate and can be difficult to detect, especially for individuals who are not familiar with common scamming tactics.

The goal of a scam is to convince the victim to part with their money or personal information, either by providing false information or making false promises. For example, a scammer might promise to double an investment in a short period of time, or claim that they have won a large sum of money and need the victim's help to access it.

Scammers often use emotional manipulation and pressure tactics to convince their victims to make decisions quickly, without taking the time to research the legitimacy of the offer. This can lead to individuals losing significant amounts of money, as well as having their personal information stolen and used for identity theft.

To avoid falling victim to a scam, it is important to be cautious and carefully research any offers or opportunities that seem too good to be true. This can include checking the legitimacy of a company or individual offering the opportunity, reading reviews and testimonials, and asking for advice from trusted friends or family members.

−31

ZingZongZaddy t1_izy7xoy wrote

Would you prefer the term "fraud" over "scam"?

24

tzedek OP t1_izyau3o wrote

Nobody is being defrauded. There's a conflict that may be problematic to some people and WAA openly discloses that conflict. If they were lying about something or price gouging perhaps it could be considered a scam, but there's no evidence of any of that.

−18

ZingZongZaddy t1_izybs28 wrote

They defrauded their way into nonprofit status. Period.

16

tzedek OP t1_izyccoi wrote

Proof? The 501c status has been audited by the IRS and reapproved in 2018. link

−6

ZingZongZaddy t1_izydlp6 wrote

Because it's technically not illegal. Their business was failing so they used their other business, sorry -charity-, to prop themselves up and get some nice, fat tax breaks at the same time.

It's government-sanctioned scumbaggery.

20