Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SqueeBug t1_j8a0vvd wrote

So there was a dog in a stroller and a pit bull? Why not also say “dog” for the pit bull?

No need to pit bull shame. Pitties, just like every other breed, are great dogs if trained. Don’t be one of those squids who feels the need to point out if a dog is a pit bull. Also 50% chance the dog wasn’t actually a pit and you’re just saying that because you didn’t like it.

0

[deleted] t1_j8a8x60 wrote

[deleted]

3

[deleted] t1_j8agds9 wrote

[removed]

2

[deleted] t1_j8bf7bv wrote

[deleted]

4

SqueeBug t1_j8dauye wrote

You are correct, name calling doesn’t alter facts. However, your “facts” are inaccurate and you are still wrong. More evidence here

−1

[deleted] t1_j8dbpn7 wrote

[deleted]

3

Norgyort OP t1_j8dh70s wrote

An opinion piece from Fox news is more factual than actual statistics lol

Edit: That's also over 10 years old

2

SqueeBug t1_j8j909e wrote

As much as I wanted to move on from your comment and just let you be wrong, I feel compelled to try one last time to educate you. Here is a study from a real life veterinary journal that shows that even shelter workers can’t correctly identify pit bulls. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109002331500310X

Now if a shelter worker can’t identify a pit bull, what makes you think the average person or a police officer can?

Unless you can show me the DNA results from the dogs who committed the attacks, the data is unreliable.

1