Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hellenic94 t1_iwcb9kc wrote

You dont need professional examination or 3 decades of electronics repairs to see if one board has more esd/static shock issues than another. Like I said, owners of space65 are more vocal about these problems than any other channel iv been in and its not by chance.

3

LASERman71 t1_iwchaqq wrote

>You dont need professional examination... to see if one board has more esd/static shock issues

You still don't see the difference between number of occurrences and the actual cause of them.

>owners of space65 are more vocal about these problems...

Obviously more people will whine about Space65 going wrong than... Razor - here lies your unprofessional perception of "more"

Like I said - this is not to dismiss the possibility this PCB is more vulnerable but this not mean it is flawed by wrong design.

My final argument is that 99% of you handle PCBs without any ESD precautions potentially compromising ESD protection and the consequences may not be immediate.

In professional approach this alone disqualifies any afterward claim against the product / maker.

0

Hellenic94 t1_iwcicau wrote

You can argue all you want. If product A has more complaints about X than product B has about X then product A has a bigger X problem. People will always leave reviews or comments when they are facing issues with a purchase. They arent on the floor rubbing themselves on a carpet while building a board man. Why would people whine less for Razor though? How many times do you go on on Amazon and compare 2 items only to choose the one with the least amount of reported problems, even though both seem to have it?

3

LASERman71 t1_iwcnu69 wrote

>They arent on the floor rubbing themselves on a carpet while building a board man.

They not assembling them correctly either. Please educate yourself with any basic electronic assembly good practice guidelines and it will surely include strong wording about ESD precautions way above not rubbing on the carpet.

The rest are questionably acquired statistics.

0