Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TechNickL t1_j17258q wrote

What you're describing is already unacceptable. It's needlessly petty at best.

Besides, it's also different. This case is more like Pepsi refusing to sell to someone who once worked for an advertising firm that made a commercial for Coke. The person affected is not a Pepsi employee, nor have they done anything except their job. And that's still disregarding how weird/disturbing it is that MSG apparently has access to the facial recognition data to bar anyone working at specific companies and is allowed to use it at will.

15