Submitted by conifer0 t3_10x2nwy in Pennsylvania
zorionek0 t1_j7qu0f5 wrote
Reply to comment by Er3bus13 in How do you feel about all the warehouses and other land development? by conifer0
I sympathize with this, but when that vacant property belongs to a different developer there isn’t really a means to prevent someone else from doing it without artificially favoring existing landholders
[deleted] t1_j7qv5fl wrote
[deleted]
Er3bus13 t1_j7qux2h wrote
The government claims land all the damn time. If it sits empty x number of years state buys back at going rate. There solved it for you.
zorionek0 t1_j7qvhrm wrote
Eminent domain is costly and people fight it in court all the time. Also, do we really want the precedent of the state seizing the property of a private individual and selling it to another because the state doesn’t like how you’re using it?
I think vacancy taxes are a better solution, for housing and retail.
Er3bus13 t1_j7qyf0d wrote
I want good soil so people can grow things. The world doesn't need a new strip mall. However we get there would be great.
IamSauerKraut t1_j7sh1zz wrote
>If it sits empty x number of years state buys back at going rate.
Define "empty."
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments