Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

moderately_random t1_jclpo5c wrote

Still fighting with boomer managers and ceos that WFH is beneficial. They’re gonna take some real convincing for this.

88

metracta t1_jclu2ew wrote

I’d support a 32 hour work week that was mostly in person (for most industries). Obviously some jobs can easily be done 100% remote, but I think we underestimate the value of human interaction. There is a lot of flexibility with many jobs though

−50

Pink_Slyvie t1_jcm3bql wrote

That's the thing.

My only employee interaction was via our internal chat software.

Then I worked remote, literally nothing changed, but I got my commute back.

38

H4l3x t1_jcmgl92 wrote

humans are absolutey awful. why would I want to interact with them?

15

AbbreviationsNo8630 t1_jcn67ok wrote

The sooner employers learn/accept that no one gives a shit about their business or their clients, the better. We there for money and nothing else, son. If you don't need to be in office, nix it if it makes a more happy, productive worker! Like Jesus. Give up the dying paradigm already. There's no reason work needs to be this homogenized thing.

11

metracta t1_jcnb7t9 wrote

I literally said the opposite of homogenized. I said employers should be flexible, some jobs should be done mostly in collaboration in person with other human beings, and some can be done totally remote. Jesus some of you people sound miserable

−8

No-Setting9690 t1_jcmcz79 wrote

Look at all these downvotes. Doing actual work is frowned upon by users on Reddit. They think it's some evil thing to do. Because they don't know what actual work is and why we do it. Reason I'm banned from antiwork, cause I explained you have to work somewhere. Whether at a company or in the damn woods hunting, it's all work.

−38

H4l3x t1_jcmgt2x wrote

he said nothing about work ethic though... his backing for non remote is human interaction...

15

[deleted] t1_jcmjdwc wrote

[deleted]

14

No-Setting9690 t1_jcmlial wrote

You have no clue what we do. We specialize in insurnace follow up. If you're in healthcare then you should know better and understand this is how the place you work for gets paid. We do it better and cheaper than organizations do as it's all we do. If we dont do our job, you dont get paid. So if you're going to work for free, then I'll consider your input..but until then stop getting what we do from.tv or the internet. It's not close at all.

−19

[deleted] t1_jcmmnz8 wrote

[deleted]

13

STLLC2019 t1_jcmsumq wrote

No, they call YOU and tell you to "street" the patient as soon as possible to avoid any further costs after the insurance company refuses to pay for treatment.

How else is the insurance company gonna see profits, after all?

6

Aezon22 t1_jcmoge6 wrote

So basically your entirely company… is just a middleman?

9

lilpufferfish t1_jcmntf2 wrote

"insurnace" How can you specialize in it if you can't even spell it?

5

metracta t1_jcmezh6 wrote

Lol. It’s really shocking. My completely reasonable take has people foaming at the mouth

−14

VenomB t1_jclynpw wrote

Considering a lot of info is coming out showing that WFH isn't that great for the employer, chances are you aren't going to.

−57

or10n_sharkfin t1_jcm18hx wrote

> WFH isn't that great for the employer

How terrible for those poor employers to not be able to afford rent. Maybe they should pick themselves up by their bootstraps and stop buying all that avocado toast.

30

ProleAcademy t1_jcm2ibt wrote

Citation needed

24

moderately_random t1_jcm5nim wrote

Cites an article from Washington Post ghost written by Bezos, saying WFH employees slack off as they don’t need to ask permission to use the bathroom

21

tyleritis t1_jcm6hhk wrote

Yeah it’s not great that the employer doesn’t pay for my electricity, coffee, water and sewer, internet, office furniture, etc.

All while getting more productivity out of me.

13