Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Odd-Seaworthiness330 t1_ir1m4g7 wrote

It is time to present the evidence or shut up. You would think that one of these judges would have enough guts to have a evidentiary hearing and call them out. The judiciary is definitely at fault here.

28

scotticusphd t1_ir1q2vj wrote

There was no evidence to review. There never was evidence to review. The people who are at fault are the ones who invented the idea of widespread fraud.

25

CatOfTheDecade t1_ir1vxkg wrote

It gets better. They filed dozens of lawsuits alleging just about everything under the sun, and when asked for evidence, they (1) refused to produce any, (2) were unable to produce any, (3) claimed that producing any would unfairly harm their case, or (4) presented something like an alleged secret agent who would only give his codename of "Wolverine" and demanded the court sign an affidavit declaring the trial to be held under maritime law or whatever.

They lost every single time. The judges have already shut them down, over and over and over again.

15

Super_C_Complex t1_ir7p5cl wrote

Now. To be fair. The one time they produced a postal worker who testified that as part of his job. He delivered mail in ballots. But he didn't like it.

2

Crouton_Sharp_Major t1_ir1ul2e wrote

This is moreso about how to do it more effectively next time, I think. This is preparation.

6

reverendsteveii t1_ir21kz3 wrote

Two years ago was time to present evidence or shut up. They were told this by judges in about 70 different court cases, and they chose to shut up (in court, where lying has consequences) every time.

4