rivershimmer t1_is22tty wrote on October 12, 2022 at 7:07 PM

Reply to comment by PM_ME_MURPHY_HATE in The Philadelphia Inquirer: The Supreme Court just undid a key ruling for counting undated Pennsylvania mail ballots by oldschoolskater

> The only acceptable amount of fraud is zero. You seem to think that there's some acceptable level of fraud in order to expand the convenience to some subset of the population. I disagree.

Of course fraud isn't acceptable. But like all crime, it's inevitable. It only rises to a problem when it's statistically significant. And it's not.

Disenfranchising large amounts of people to prevent tiny amounts of frauds is a classic case of ignoring the forest for the trees. That amount of fraud is too small to have any effect on elections. Mass disentrancement does.

>Have a nice day sir.

And you too, maam.

HairyHouse2 t1_is2y0xz wrote on October 12, 2022 at 10:30 PM

This dude definitely thinks Trump actually won don't even bother 😂

rivershimmer t1_is32py3 wrote on October 12, 2022 at 11:05 PM

Eh, I enjoy this sort of thing, for rea.

"Election fraud" has become a euphemism. No one concerned about election fraud is seriously concerned about election fraud. They are using it as a socially-acceptable cover for what they are really trying to do.