Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

d0s4gw t1_itdh7or wrote

Reply to comment by capitocoto in A Queer Community Speaks Up for Student After Teacher's Transphobia by wdcmsnbcgay

No, there are things people can say that can warrant being fired. As an example - https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/houston-teacher-fired-after-racist-comments-were-recorded-during-class

The discussion we’re having is, can there be things that a person doesn’t say that warrants being fired? The court case I linked based in part on the first amendment suggests the precedent says no. It’s pretty clear that this is a constitutional issue, and the school in question also sees it that way because they withdrew the policy.

1

capitocoto t1_itdl53f wrote

Per the article, the teacher was actively using the wrong pronouns for the student. That goes beyond being compelled to say something - the teacher was actively misgendering the student.

You clearly have zero understand of speech, employment, or grammar.

1

d0s4gw t1_itdoklc wrote

Try reading more material on the topic. No student was misgendered. And try to stop being such a judgmental prick

1

capitocoto t1_itdpua4 wrote

Do you not know what misgender means? If you don’t, the dictionary can help.

This teacher refused to gender his student properly which is the very definition of misgendering the student.

1

d0s4gw t1_itdtv5n wrote

No student was misgendered. The teacher refused to agree to a policy on preferred pronouns. There were no students involved. https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/local/2022/10/06/south-side-school-district-reinstates-teacher-suspended-refusing-to-use-preferred-pronouns-beaver/69544475007/

0

capitocoto t1_itdw3rj wrote

Where are you getting that information?

Because there is no where in the article that you linked where it says no student was misgendered. It says the superintendent declined to give comment about the case.

Declining to give comment =/= no student got misgendered.

This article states he was suspended because he refused to comply with his employer’s policy

Btw I am greatly amused that you have changed both tactics and goal posts. Your first argument was that this was a First Amendment issue and no one can compel this man’s speech. Now you have abandoned it and your new argument is that because no student was harmed, it shouldn’t be a problem.

A+

1

d0s4gw t1_itdxkc5 wrote

It’s still a first amendment issue. The teacher was reinstated. You’re a dick.

1