Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_iu5oc4z wrote

Reply to comment by Gym-Coach in The first post-debate poll is in: Oz takes the lead over Fetterman +3% by LetsPlayCanasta

We dont need enhanced geothermal energy although we helped innovate in that field.

https://www.invest.is/press--media/news/invest/world%E2%80%99s-first-magma-egs-system-created/213

The biggest viable options is nuclear but you guys are investing in systems that are years or decades away while making the average person feel the pain until thats possible.

2

Gym-Coach t1_iu5t63e wrote

Of course you don't, but we do and it will employ many thousands of people. Thanks for that article, but it's (mostly) not what we will be doing here.

Nuclear has a future only if it can be done in a way to get on a learning curve. Otherwise it will remain too expensive and too slow to implement.

That's false. We are building out solar and wind now while developing & commercializing new options.

My most recent client is an electric construction company in the process of more than doubling in size (again) from $200M to $500M, with transmission lines, substations and grid solar array installation as their primary growth areas with lots of good paying union jobs.

2