Attaboy Cartwright.

Although Luzerne said they’ll certify on Wednesday so the long is moot.

Jim Bognet has run three times now and lost every time. At a certain point he’s gotta figure out we don’t like him, right?

But he can kick a field goal. That’s gotta count for something.

Or that the majority of the electorate is not interested in him or his party's politics and no matter the candidate, the fascist insurgent party will lose that race. They just arent palatable at this time.

I just find it funny that he keeps winning primaries and then getting beat

About 3 points.

Can he throw a pigskin a quarter mile?

[removed]

Doesn't matter when they said they'll do it, its past the date where it is required so they can will and are getting sued

[removed]

Right over them mountains

ON OUR WAY TO THE NORTH

Technically correct, but a moot point means something no longer matters. The remedy a judge would impose is to certify the election. It’s Wednesday now, so unless the judge hears this case before the board meeting the election will already be certified.

He should try not driving around in a conversion van with his campaign signs taped to every surface. Dude pulled up to the polling place I was greeting at and I made sure he overheard me saying he looked like a child molester giving out free candy.

Chinese restaurant owner: I yell Cartwright, nobody come, she say curseword, I hang up.

Jerry: Who's Cartwright?

George (sarcastically): I'm Cartwright....

Jerry: "...but you're not Cartwright."

George: OF COURSE I'M NOT CARTWRIGHT!!!

The guy that abstained from the first vote will vote to certify the election so this lawsuit will be moot. The whole voter fraud charade is really stupid.

Different point:

> boards must certify the result of election returns regardless of any error or fraud that is discovered during the count or certification process

This seems wrong. There was no widespread in this election so this is a hypothetical point. Let’s say there was solid evidence of widespread fraud. What’s the remedy? How do you certify an election you know to be fraudulent?

About 2 more points than he has on the top of his head...

You shoulda gifted him the appropriate sound system so that kids (and voters) would be warned he is nearby...

Depends on your definition of "know." MAGAt nation has redefined the word.

He's entering Lou Barletta territory

Seems the answer was in the rest of the sentence?

> “Indeed, boards must certify the result of election returns regardless of any error or fraud that is discovered during the count or certification process,” the suit states, noting a Pennsylvania statute that instructs boards to instead file reports about fraudulent or erroneous returns to a district attorney.

Why should they certify something that they are unsure of? The word certify has meaning and generally means that it has been verified to meet some standard. I would think withholding certification until the DA completes the investigation would be more appropriate

Answer: America!

and they wonder why Trump gains popularity.

it's dumb stuff like this.

Yes it’s these weird idiosyncrasies that made Trump popular and not him being a giant asshole racist piece of shit who made it acceptable for other assholes to openly be asshole racist pieces of shit. You nailed it.

Downdooted because the answer to your question immediately follows the part of the law you quote and this feels like shit stirring to me.

Well who's to decide that any "evidence" is legit? The election workers? FUCK NO. They are not legal experts and have no jurisdiction to do so.

It would go through the court system, and if it was indeed solid evidence, it would be dealt with by people that have the authority to do so.