Submitted by Yelloeisok t3_zvrbzs in Pennsylvania
stahleo t1_j1r82lo wrote
Reply to comment by eviljelloman in Pennsylvania politics are heated. It soon could be utter chaos by Yelloeisok
Boomer is defined as an elderly person. Why are you discriminating someone's age? Be better.
EDIT: Why does this sub condone age discrimination?
Zenith2017 t1_j1r8c1i wrote
Meanwhile, as boomers vote against basic human rights:
stahleo t1_j1r9346 wrote
Discriminate against a group of people because you don't like how they vote.
Makes sense. /s
Zenith2017 t1_j1rbeht wrote
Oh no did we call them boomers on a reddit thread
stahleo t1_j1rchdq wrote
Openly promoting age discrimination without any concern. Keep it classy, bigot.
jakopappi t1_j1rtvv0 wrote
Hey you got em! You got em good good for you keep up thr good lords work you're a saint!
Zenith2017 t1_j1rvswl wrote
.... Meanwhile, as boomers vote against basic human rights lmao hold on to yer outrage folks
stahleo t1_j1rwmlt wrote
I'm not outraged. I was more so curious why the open age discrimination.
Zenith2017 t1_j1s6y88 wrote
What discrimination? Boomer is not a slur
Diarygirl t1_j1s7w0h wrote
As a conservative, you're outraged by whatever Fox News tells you to be outraged about 24/7
stahleo t1_j1s81tv wrote
I don't watch Fox News. As usual, you make an ass out of yourself when you assume things.
DavidLieberMintz t1_j1u50c7 wrote
In your own words, how do you define discrimination? When someone on the internet calls you names? Because that ain't it.
SendAstronomy t1_j1rulwo wrote
No, we discriminate you because your demographic is a majority of shitty people with a "got mine fuck you" attitude.
Huh, everyone like that votes republican? What a shock!
DavidLieberMintz t1_j1u4not wrote
So anytime someone is mean to you, it's instantly discrimination? I guess the boomers were the real snowflakes all along.
dclxvi616 t1_j1r8wjw wrote
> Boomer is defined as an elderly person.
It's a descriptive term for a person who was born between 1946 and 1964. That's actually quite different than "an elderly person."
stahleo t1_j1r9868 wrote
Oh, so the term was used as a compliment?
dclxvi616 t1_j1ra251 wrote
What is the point of using words at all if you're just going to read whatever the hell you want? "Boomer" is not equivalent to "an elderly person" just as "different" is not equivalent to "better".
stahleo t1_j1rd9q9 wrote
Sure, let's use your definition - someone born between 1946 - 1964.
So instead of discriminating against an "elderly person," it's against someone nearly 60 years of age and older. Where's the difference? There is none. It's the same.
If the primary reason you are calling them a "boomer" is because of their age group, then (in the way it was used) it is, in fact, age discrimination.
dclxvi616 t1_j1rdm3s wrote
>it's against someone nearly 60 years of age and older.
Again, you're getting this definition incorrect. Someone who is 80 years old right now is not a boomer.
>If the primary reason you are calling them a "boomer" is because of their age group, then (in the way it was used) it is, in fact, age discrimination.
Sure, it's age discrimination. It's generational discrimination. It's not a blanket discrimination against the elderly though. I said it's different, not better.
stahleo t1_j1re6j0 wrote
>Sure, it's age discrimination.
Great, we agree.
Steven_Snippert t1_j1rbgk3 wrote
It's not. It's defined as people born in the years after World War II until about 1964.
eviljelloman t1_j1wnyvj wrote
Being so entitled that you think a person insulting you on the internet is the same as discrimination is a peak white boomer move.
Now go on a rant about how I’m racist too. You know you want to, snowflake.
Spankywanky225 t1_j1shbn2 wrote
Because you’re not sucking Democrat dick lol
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments