Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Zenith2017 t1_j4tkwet wrote

Reply to comment by pizzapantifa in LAWSUIT: FIRE sues Pennsylvania county after officials ban talking politics in a public park by NeatPeteYeet

Wow, that's a lotta words. Too bad I'm not reading em 😎😎😎😎😎

4

Super_C_Complex t1_j4tskpb wrote

Same. It's like someone opened a thesaurus while mad at the door for not being a window.

3

Zenith2017 t1_j4v6mc3 wrote

Right? I told them three times I'm only saying that it is legal (most likely anyway), and not that I want it to be legal. Literal plugging ears and screaming lalalala

2

pizzapantifa t1_j4ttsmx wrote

How would you know if you didn't read it?

1

Super_C_Complex t1_j4tu3yv wrote

> You're a problem regardless of whether you choose to accept that or not and I'll continue to advocate for people to hold the well-being of individuals (regardless of their sensitivities) above the ability of organizations and corporations to co-opt what should be havens from their already gargantuan onslaught of rather obvious and intrusive psy-ops. (Yes, psy-ops. These groups employ psychologists expressly for the purpose of finding the most efficient manner to manipulate you and this has been going on for decades.)

I read that

4

pizzapantifa t1_j4tu7vg wrote

>Too bad I'm not reading em

🤔

>Same

Let me put down the thesaurus to find you a dictionary.

−1

NotNowDamo t1_j4ul04e wrote

This guy is trying to be morally superior to you while defending an immoral position (limiting freedom of expression is immoral, even when we disagree with the message being expressed).

2

Zenith2017 t1_j4v4saz wrote

They brought up a ton of stuff I never said or implied that they're just assuming about me because I disagreed lol. Like "why is it invalid to try to convince others to work with me", the worshipping the constitution bit, implying that I even want people to do this canvassing in parks thing.

I didn't bother to do more than skim because it became obvious they didn't listen to what I said

3

pizzapantifa t1_j4ttbso wrote

I expected nothing more.

1

Zenith2017 t1_j4v587e wrote

Well, you said a bunch of shit that I didn't say. I never said it's invalid to discuss the constitution for example, you just assumed I think that. So I'm not really feeling like your thesaurus rant deserves a real reply

How old are you

2

pizzapantifa t1_j4v7mki wrote

I suppose it is much easier to dodge this and resort to insulting me than it is to support what you did say and address my criticisms.

I'm old enough to laugh at your repeated deflections.

Shouldn't you be doing something that would actually change anything instead of engaging with "thesaurus rants"? (Sorry, I'll avoid trisylla- words that make more than 2 sounds.)

1

Zenith2017 t1_j4v95un wrote

Engaging with thesaurus rants makes me giggle

1

pizzapantifa t1_j4x500o wrote

"I'm not gonna read that!"

"engaging with thesaurus rants makes me giggle."

🥱 thread muted. Learn to read and focus on peoples' communications instead of bIg WoRd MAkE Me MaD

1