Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

NotTRYINGtobeLame t1_j5m3piu wrote

Reply to comment by its_laps in Pennsylvania House Republicans want to be called back to vote on constitutional amendments by themollusk

At least my question made logical sense following what had been said. Not a single thing I said leads to me defending those who abuse children. If you really feel that question was appropriate, have a nice day, don't bother replying!

−5

its_laps t1_j5m437r wrote

No, to you it made logical sense.

Now you know how the rest of us felt when we read your garbage comment.

Edit: they have now blocked me. Funny after all that complaining about wanting to discuss things.

13

NotTRYINGtobeLame t1_j5m4eyb wrote

My dude up there said, quote, "It seems like the Republicans are attaching several amendments to the bill that would further their political agenda." I merely asked if he believed that Democrats have never done that? If you can't connect the logical dots from a person saying 1 party does something to me asking if they believe the other party doesn't do that same something, then we're not going to get anywhere.

−4

its_laps t1_j5mdhde wrote

The premise of your question is asinine and the point of your comment was to disgustingly defend the actions of Republican politicizing child sexual abuse victims.

You have made an invalid attempt to discredit an opponent by answering criticism with criticism — but never actually presented a counterargument to the original disputed claim.

13

NEBook_Worm t1_j5onalh wrote

Ahh personal attacks. The last refuge of those with no logical counter arguments.

−5

Spankywanky225 t1_j5opn5d wrote

Haven’t you learned you can’t argue with hypocrites on this sub?

−1

NEBook_Worm t1_j5oy1hm wrote

Oh I know. Occasionally though, I get a kick out of exposing their hypocrisy. I find the current classified documents debacle delightful.

0

Spankywanky225 t1_j5pqb9b wrote

It’s great to see. Keep up the good work, I like it 👍🏻

−2