Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

t1_j9kmu96 wrote

So frigging wrong, he did this outside work, taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for this shit

43

t1_j9kzbpu wrote

If that’s your argument, then he shouldn’t have been suspended since the incident happened outside of his shift.

But he was suspended, charged and acquitted.

If this was some teacher accused and found not to be guilty, you’d probably not be singing the same tune.

−33

t1_j9kzzva wrote

[removed]

11

t1_j9l0iaw wrote

Interesting comment, since I’ve been doing this for over a decade and it seems to pay me.

Sounds like I do have a real job.

−31

t1_j9nc3ro wrote

Aren't you the same guy defending chris delia the pedophile? I hope you aren't ever assigned to sex crimes.

4

t1_j9ndnmd wrote

I won’t apologize for believing in a fundamental right of a presumption of innocence.

−3

t1_j9nihea wrote

I hope you aren't ever assigned to sex crimes.

Cause 10 times out of 9 you are going to take the sex criminals side, clearly.

3

t1_j9np7q9 wrote

Nice try flipping the script, but it’s the juries job to determine the facts, I just present them.

Also, it’s the AG’s office that determines if the charges will be put to a grand jury or info’d.

No one’s fault that many sexual assault cases lack any physical evidence beyond fluids, like finger prints or possession.

1

t1_j9npayo wrote

Chris delia had his victims tattoo his name on them 💀

3