Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Grand_Profession_207 t1_itehb4u wrote

Not the case, adverse possession even transfers between owners who assume ownership of a parcel of land I.e “tacking”

https://casetext.com/case/taffinder-v-thomas

3

JimmyHavok t1_iteiy53 wrote

This is the opposite of the situation. The plaintiff is tacking the use by the previous tenant onto their claim, not asserting their ownership against a new owner.

−1

Grand_Profession_207 t1_itejjp0 wrote

Yeah, my point was you would think between the two scenarios, the one involving tacking wouldn’t be have been permissible but it was.

4