Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lelekfalo t1_ixw132f wrote

Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in Non-Political RI Gun Law Question by provendumb

Tell me you know nothing about firearms without telling me you know nothing about firearms.

36

Status_Silver_5114 t1_ixw24wl wrote

Is that not factually correct tho? Go ahead I’ll wait.

−2

Billiam201 t1_ixw7iod wrote

You won't be waiting long. No, it's not correct.

17

ProvBroker t1_ixwgu3a wrote

Lol, no it’s not factually correct. Honestly commentary like what you are contributing betrays a complete ignorance of firearm construction and function.

I won’t berate you like the others, but this sort of know nothing commentary leaves pro gun-control legislators and proponents mouths all of the time, which only serves to make the folks who understand the subject matter uncomfortable about accepting the proposals, as it makes it clear the gun control people have absolutely no idea how the thing they are regulating even works.

It’s very important that we have thoughtful and nuanced regulation around the matter so that we can protect important constitutional rights while mitigating tragedies and violence involving deadly weaponry.

16

MajorDrGhastly t1_ixwffog wrote

i cant imagine ever embarrassing myself so hard as you have just done. just go to bed friend.

9

Yz-Guy t1_ixwgqxk wrote

This was a roller coaster. Lol

2

anonymous_troII t1_ixwtv47 wrote

No dumb dumb. It's not factual. There will be an injunction. The law is unconstitutional, see the response from the lawyer above. There is precedent showing this will be overturned.

7