Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CarltheWellEndowed t1_j9b2k0w wrote

Not really.

1+1=6 is objectively wrong.

Now if you are talking about morality, then you may or may not be correct.

9

Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j9b28e4 wrote

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

1

Whiskoo t1_j9b6gpn wrote

moral right and moral wrong, yes theres an argument.

but facts are objectively right.

1

kevineleveneleven t1_j9b8v0g wrote

Ethics and morality are currently mostly subjective. We can form a consensus, though. But instead of the subjective dualities right/wrong and good/evil, I like better pairs like healthy/unhealthy, productive/unproductive, helpful/harmful. These can be objectively measured. Quality of Life can be measured. Mental health can be measured. So we could redefine good and evil to these objective measures and form new standards of morality and ethics that aren't subjective.

1