Submitted by Sariel007 t3_zamxg9 in UpliftingNews
That is genuinely uplifting.
It's nice to see this sub true to its title.
What makes it great is that despite some groups efforts to block book reading, there are still so many more people getting into reading. Especially at a young age. It's heartwarming.
Are there really any groups trying to stop people from reading books?
Could you show me some evidence of that please.
Many governors (mostly in Republican led states) have increased their pace to ban certain books.
This site gives a basic rundown of what to look for and the understanding of the laws surrounding the bans.
Ahh ban certain books.
Not to stop children reading then.....
That's you making a false equivalency to push your own political narrative.
I'm not American, I don't have a dog in that race, I still see what you are trying to do
Why is a private citizen doing the work of the public schools and of county and state orgs to increase reading among children, in the states? Why are elementary ed libraries and reading programs lacking staffing or funding? That’s a choice.
Dolly Parton’s private philanthropy is wonderful—but why aren’t leaders and educators using taxpayer funding for this, vs paying millions for high football stadiums and locker rooms or for school police forces/guns for troopers drives, vs educational/classroom and teacher funding?
Everything is a choice and everything is political, when it comes to taxes, budgets/funding and education.
Now this statement I can fully agree with.
ALL politicians are liers and just trying to get themselves another term.
that’s technically correct but not practically correct. These governors, pundits, propagandists, etc. have whipped people into such a frenzy, that specific US localities have entirely defunded specific libraries beyond operation to limit access to “certain” materials by limiting access to ALL materials. Technically speaking, a false equivalency; practically speaking, not at all.
Downvotes without refutation are Redditspeak for “tell me I’m right, without telling me I’m right”, lol. Sounds like someone got called out on a bad faith argument and knows it.
That might be true in a reasonable society but Yankia is hardly reasonable. As we see in their abortion rights “debate”, they focus on particular cases until they have the momentum then ban everything. Like the 10yo girl in Ohio, in any reasonable country she would have got a life saving medical intervention, but the ban that supposedly targeted the “women who do it because children are annoying” types was broad enough to included her.
TLDR: they talk about some books, but they want to ban (almost) all books
[removed]
[removed]
If only Ohio was real. Is this a concept for real states, though? That’d be cool.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments