[deleted] t1_iz5vfjs wrote
Reply to comment by No_Instruction2123 in Dog reunited with family 7 days after falling from cliff on Vancouver Island by Born2bBread
[deleted]
No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5w4e1 wrote
Dude….. that’s the law in nearly every English speaking country, which I’m assuming by your proper use of English you are from, but maybe I’m wrong.
It’s called “duty to rescue”, nobody has the legal responsibility to save anyone else if it involves endangering themselves. And it should absolutely stay that way, you’re insane if you think otherwise.
[deleted] t1_iz5xezw wrote
[deleted]
No_Instruction2123 t1_iz5xjuk wrote
In what other possible situation would I have to choose between my cats and neighbors? Seriously?
[deleted] t1_iz6167s wrote
[deleted]
No_Instruction2123 t1_iz62hs2 wrote
I have no obligation to risk my life in a fire to save my neighbors. If I choose to save my cats I’m well within my right. That’s the lawful argument which you should be fully aware of based on your previous statements. Also I’m 100% sure most people would choose their pets over a near stranger anyway, but believe what you like
>idk why you got upset and decided to get involved
Nice projection, keep coping kid :)
[deleted] t1_iz64lv0 wrote
[deleted]
No_Instruction2123 t1_iz652zt wrote
Got ‘em 🤡🤡🤡
Sprinkle_Puff t1_iz61z9s wrote
In the US you absolutely would not be criminally liable.
[deleted] t1_iz64t9b wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments